Documentation > SXT Observation Notes > this page

Changes Caused by Time and by CCD Bakeout - I

Image name: CCD_CHANGES_I.png (click image to enlarge)
Image size: 773.367 KB (1024x982)
Date submitted: 13-Oct-1996

Description:
							LWA, 13-Oct-96

                   CHANGES CAUSED BY TIME AND BY CCD BAKEOUT - I


This array of images demonstrate the changes in the CCD caused by 3 years
of operation (LH column) and by a CCD bakeout at each of the two epochs. 
The LH images were prepared (flattened) with the program SXT_DIFUSER2 from
the pairs of observations indicated by *:

    3-NOV-93  08:40:52  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm L   4     2.9  512x512
    3-NOV-93  08:43:00  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm C   4     2.9  512x512
 * 10-NOV-93  07:32:35  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm L   4     2.9  512x512
 * 10-NOV-93  07:34:43  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm C   4     2.9  512x512

    3-OCT-96  05:14:29  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm C   2     1.0  512x512
    3-OCT-96  05:15:41  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm L   2     1.0  512x512
 * 11-OCT-96  23:56:01  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm C   2     1.0  512x512
 * 11-OCT-96  23:57:21  QT/H  Diffu/Open  Half Norm L   2     1.0  512x512

Note the evolution of radiation damage in both diffuse and discrete
(specks) features.

The lower RH image is the difference of the Oct-96 pre-bake flattened image
and its corresponding pre-bake diffuser image.  The corresponding Nov-93
difference is pretty flat -- with a gaussian histogram.  The Oct-96 bakeout
had more non-gaussian structure.  Perhaps this is caused by the larger
period between bakeouts (7 months) in this case.  The Nov-93 bakeout was
only 3 months following the previous CCD bakeout. 

The pointing for the 3 bakeouts was:

      482.300      603.800
      482.190      603.450
      483.590      602.450
      483.990      601.950

for the Nov-93 set and

      536.180      594.810
      536.430      594.790
      537.730      592.760
      537.950      592.270

for the Oct-96 set.  This difference in pointing makes it difficult to
directly compare the intensity pattern for the two cases.  However the
difference of the flattened (uppper and lower LH images) images, shown in
the upper right, indicates the 3-year changes in radiation damage.  Here
dark means additional radiation damage.  It appears that some healing may
have taken place at the west limb area.

The enhanced horizontal streaking in the corners of the Oct-96 difference
image is probably evidence for contamination which orients along the CCD
gate grooves.  This was observed to happen in pre-launch studies of
contaminated CCDs.

It should be mentioned that I still do not fully understand why the
diffuser images reveal the pattern of radiation damage.



To the YLA Guide front page with side-frame
To contact us: